ABSTRACT
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to present a systematic review of the effects of COVID-19 on the conventional textile production subsector. The emergence of the COVID-19 virus in 2019 has subsequently caused many problems, such as unemployment, business closures, economic instability and high volatility in the global capital markets amongst others within the wider manufacturing industry including textile production. Design/methodology/approachRelevant secondary data are obtained from the Scopus database and Statista. Based on the data analysis of 21 seed articles, three research themes are identified: challenges in the textile industry, new material innovations or solutions and the textile industry performance. FindingsThe results reveal that the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the textile industry, disrupted the supply chains of this industry, affected profit margins, stopped employment and impacted the retail of products to customers. Aside from the negative repercussions, there are also good sides to the pandemic which, for instance, range from advanced material innovations to textiles with anti-microbial, self-cleaning and anti-bacterial properties that would limit the transfer of the virus. Practical implicationsFindings reinforced the need for effective strategies and investments in the research and development departments of the various firms in the textile industry to innovate operations and novel materials for the next global pandemic. Originality/valueMany companies have adopted novel strategies and practices that are helping them to survive the pandemic. This study, therefore, recommends further investigation into material innovations and reimagining strategies by companies and the supply chain within the textile industry so that it is protected against future crises.
ABSTRACT
Background: Early studies show that the COVID-19 pandemic has led to reduced prescription of direct-acting anti-viral (DAA) treatment for hepatitis C (HCV) infection. We sought to characterize HCV patients started on DAAs during the pandemic in British Columbia, Canada. Methods: A retrospective chart review of multiple sites was conducted using the British Columbia HCV Network. Patients initiated on DAA for HCV treatment from 09/17/2018- 09/17/2021 were included. Those treated for 18 months prior to 03/17/2020 were included as the pre-pandemic group (pre-PG) and those treated after 03/17/2020 comprised the pandemic group (PG). Results: A total of 393 patients were included, with 221 pre-PG patients and 172 PG patients, representing a 23% decline in HCV treatment during the pandemic. PG patients were significantly younger with mean age 55 years (vs 56 years pre- PG, p<0.01) and a higher proportion were on opioid agonist therapy (OAT) at 28% (vs 12% pre-PG, p<0.01). Rates of alcohol and active substance use were similar between both groups. Both groups had similar HCV genotypes, viral load, and FIB-4 scores. Pre-treatment transient elastography (TE) within 3 months of initiating treatment was completed in significantly fewer PG patients at 37% compared with 70% pre-PG (p<0.01). Of PG and pre-PG patients who completed TE, cirrhosis was found in 15 (9%) and 32 (14%) respectively, with mean liver stiffness measure of 8.69 kPa and 10.21 kPa, respectively. Beyond less utilization of TE, the pandemic also led to reduced total appointments at mean 3.1 visits per PG patient compared to 4.2 visits per pre-PG patient (<0.01). Considering the different types of appointments, PG patients had fewer office appointments at mean 1.6 per PG patient (vs 3.1 per pre-PG patient, p <0.01) but more telehealth appointments at mean 2.5 per PG patient (vs 2.1 per pre-PG patient, p <0.01). Treatment regimen was similar in both groups with predominant use of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir. Treatment completion rate was 95% in PG patients compared to 89% pre-PG (p=0.03). Fewer PG patients completed lab work for sustained virologic response (SVR) at 61% (vs 88% pre-PG) however, SVR rate was similar between both groups (96% pre-PG and 99% PG, p=NS). Active drug use or OAT was not associated with treatment completion or SVR in either group. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a decrease in HCV treatment rates. However, treatment completion and SVR rates remained high among those treated, suggesting minimal-pre-treatment investigations and use of telemedicine can optimize scarce resources with similar efficacy. (Figure Presented)
ABSTRACT
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted healthcare access, including to curative treatment for hepatitis C (HCV) infection in the form of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). A 49% decrease in DAA dispensations in Canada during the pandemic has been reported, but little is known about these treated populations. Aims To explore the patient characteristics and treatment patterns in those who were treated for HCV during the COVID pandemic. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted at one site of utilizing the British Columbia Hepatitis C Network. Only patients included into the database were analyzed. Patients started on treatment between 03/17/2020-03/16/2021 were included as the “pandemic group” and patients from the 03/17/2019-03/16/2020 were included as a comparison “pre-pandemic group”. Data were extracted for clinicodemographic variables, laboratory investigations, treatment start date, regimen, and sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12). Results 97 patients were treated during the pandemic compared to 143 patients the year prior, representing a 32% decline. Patients treated during the pandemic were predominantly new referrals (n=70, 72% vs n=64, 45% pre-pandemic, p<0.01) and had fewer total appointments (median 2 per patient vs 4 per patient pre-pandemic, p<0.01). There was a median of 1 in-person visit and 1 telehealth appointment per patient during the pandemic (vs median 2 per patient of each type pre-pandemic). Pandemic patients were younger (mean age 56.0 years vs 59.6 pre-pandemic, p=0.04), and a greater proportion were on opioid agonist therapy (28% vs 13% pre-pandemic, p<0.01). Less transient elastography (TE) was performed during the pandemic (69% vs 89% pre-pandemic). Amongst those with TE scores, a lower proportion of those treated during the pandemic were cirrhotic (13% vs 21% pre-pandemic). During the pandemic, treatment patterns shifted towards more prescriptions for glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (56% of all prescriptions vs 44% pre-pandemic) and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (37% vs 29% pre-pandemic). There was slightly less use of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir at (2% vs 4% pre-pandemic). The proportion of patients who completed lab work for SVR was similar during the pandemic (n=83/97, 85.6%) compared to pre-pandemic (n=120/143, 83.9%). Similarly, SVR12 remained high during the pandemic at 98.7% (vs 99.3% pre-pandemic). Of all 97 patients prescribed DAAs during the pandemic, 92 (94.8%) completed treatment. Conclusions Less persons were treated during the COVID pandemic, which may deter progress towards HCV elimination targets. Very high SVR12 and treatment completion rates during the pandemic suggest that patients can be effectively treated with less pre-treatment investigations and fewer appointments. Funding Agencies None